翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ South Carolina State Hospital ・ South Carolina State House ・ South Carolina State Museum ・ South Carolina State Transport Police Division ・ South Carolina State University ・ South Carolina State University School of Law ・ South Carolina statistical areas ・ South Carolina Stingrays ・ South Carolina Supreme Court ・ South Carolina Synod ・ South Carolina Technical College System ・ South Carolina Terminal Company ・ South Carolina v. Baker ・ South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc. ・ South Carolina v. Gathers ・ South Carolina v. Katzenbach ・ South Carolina v. North Carolina ・ South Carolina Warriors ・ South Carolina Western Extension Railway ・ South Carolina Western Railway ・ South Carolina Western Railway Station ・ South Carolina wine ・ South Carolina Wing Civil Air Patrol ・ South Carolina World War II Army Airfields ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 1825 ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 1971 ・ South Carolina's 1st congressional district special election, 2013 ・ South Carolina's 2nd congressional district ・ South Carolina's 2nd congressional district special election, 1795 Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク South Carolina v. Katzenbach ： ウィキペディア英語版 South Carolina v. Katzenbach ''South Carolina v. Katzenbach'', 383 U.S. 301 (1966) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court rejected a challenge by the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach).〔http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_22_orig South Carolina v. Katzenbach, U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument〕 ==Background== In South Carolina, the state attorney general, Daniel R. McLeod filed a complaint directly with the Supreme Court attacking the constitutionality of the act and asking for an injunction against enforcement by the attorney general of the United States, Nicholas Katzenbach. McLeod challenged the Voting Rights Act as an unconstitutional encroachment on states’ rights, as a violation of equality between the states, and as an illegal bill of attainder (legislative punishment enforced without due process of law.) 〔 Finkelman, Paul. "South Carolina v. Katzenbach." Milestone Documents in African American History: Exploring the Essential Primary Sources. ed. Vol. 4. 2010. Print.〕 South Carolina was joined on its attack on the Voting Rights Act by other southern states. Meanwhile, twenty states that filed in support of the act’s provisions and powers mainly consisted of northern states and western states. The case took on an even wider significance than normal in a state challenge to a new federal law. 〔 The decision represents a rare instance of the Supreme Court exercising its original jurisdiction, as the case was filed directly in the Supreme Court by the state of South Carolina, rather than being appealed from a lower court. The court intentionally heard the case prior to the 1966 elections. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「South Carolina v. Katzenbach」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.